Aston Villa Rumours Archive May 20 2013

 

Use our rumours form to send us aston villa transfer rumours.

20 May 2013 19:52:19
Villa and Everton weighing up a move for Aiden Mcgeady but is he worth the 9.5m price tag being qouted

Believable4 Unbelievable14

The only thing that would make sense from this is the experience he would bring but I would be shocked if villa bought him for a sum anywhere near that, its a no hoper and his club will not sell on the cheap. Plus. he will have no sell on value so no chance will this be happening.

Agree4 Disagree1

He sai he wanted to leave and would take a pay cut, so maybe they would accept 5 mill, and he is a brilliant player it is just marred by I'll discipline, if lambert ca get him to calm Dow it could prove to be a very good signing

Agree2 Disagree2

Bad bad bad move goes against everything we've done this season and would be demoralising to some of the players me would think

Agree2 Disagree1

Definitely DO NOT want mcgeady. we pay out for him that's most our budget. we won't buy anyone over 25 yrs old or anyone over 6-7 million because its jus the way villa work buy them young and cheap and develop the balls out of them. look at westwood lowton etc. no mcgeady not the 'villa way'

Agree2 Disagree1

Didn't PL sign Vlaar, El Ahmadi an re signed Guzan? Who are over 25 if I'm not wrong.

I wouldn't be surprised if we signed players between 25 an 28 but I don't think McGeady is the right type of player we need. We need to sign a CB an a LB maybe another DM before we sign wingers or striker

Agree8 Disagree0

20 May 2013 14:16:53
Villa contemplating re-signing Harry Forrester from Brentford,

Believable11 Unbelievable12

You shouldn't of mentioned brentford. People disagree purely for a low league team. If it said barca it would be a different story

Agree3 Disagree4

People disagreed purely because forrester is not gunna improve our team an wouldn't even improve our reserve team, so it would be a pointless signing.
Let's hope it's not true

Agree8 Disagree3

I would have him over Bannan any day of the week! At least he has a little something about him, unlike wee Jimmy Krankie who like a place kicker in grid iron can only take corners

Agree2 Disagree5

20 May 2013 12:58:10
Luke Murphy in talks with Villa according to close sources - likely to be first signing!

Believable15 Unbelievable3

Murphy will sign within 2-3 weeks for 3-4m, once Villas players have signed new contracts.

And followed by Charlie Austin for 4m

Agree10 Disagree5

It won't be as high as £4m as he's entering his final year of contract and will be available for £1-£2m at the very most.

Agree5 Disagree3

Austin will cost more than 4mill

Agree3 Disagree8

Why would we need Austin? Bench player same role as benteke but all round weaker

Agree1 Disagree6

Austin will be a bench warmer at most. Prefer a different type to him as Bowery will develop this year.

Agree3 Disagree3

I've heard a lot of fans talk of bent not being able to fit in to PLs style of football, if that's the case why is Austin being targeted as a potential signing? Good striker but He's just as one dimensional as bent

Agree6 Disagree4

But a lot cheaper wouldn't demand hhigh wages and will sign for 2-4m

Agree3 Disagree2

Why would burnley sell Austin for
1m-2m? They might aswell keep him for his last year of his contract an hope he fires them in to the prem.
He'll cost 4m minimum cus anythin less wouldn't be worth them selling

Agree9 Disagree3

Murphy will be cheap £1-2m, Austin is not a type of player Lambert will sign when we already have many strikers capable of doing what he does and probably better. some people have no clue about football.

Agree4 Disagree4

Murphy will cost approx £2 - 2.5 million if villa sign him soon. Otherwise they may get involved in a bidding war as man united have made a opening bid of £800, 00. which has been turned down (think they were taking the -iss with this offer).

Agree0 Disagree0

20 May 2013 10:11:32
Villa eyeing a move for Chalie Austin from Burnley 23 yr old striker who's scored 28 goals this season

Believable11 Unbelievable6

He would play on the bench don't see the point really

Agree6 Disagree11

Its a squad game pal so quality on the bench is as important as quality on the pitch.

Agree12 Disagree2

And he's a cheaper option to Darren Bent (who's younger and hungrier) as much as Bent is a preditor in front of goal our team just doesn't suit him anymore as our strikers work more in creating goals rather than having it served to him.

Agree8 Disagree2

Have any of you watched him? Seriously he's not that good, he scored I think 23 goals in the first 13 games and the 5 all season I just hope this deal dosent go threw

Agree3 Disagree4

I used to go to a lot of Swindon games. He's class but will need 1 year to settle in before he becomes as prolific as he is in the championship

Agree1 Disagree1