Aston Villa Rumours Archive May 20 2013
Use our rumours form to send us aston villa transfer rumours.
20 May 2013 19:52:19
Villa and Everton weighing up a move for Aiden Mcgeady but is he worth the 9.5m price tag being qouted
Believable4
Unbelievable14
The only thing that would make sense from this is the experience he would bring but I would be shocked if villa bought him for a sum anywhere near that, its a no hoper and his club will not sell on the cheap. Plus. he will have no sell on value so no chance will this be happening.
Agree4
Disagree1
He sai he wanted to leave and would take a pay cut, so maybe they would accept 5 mill, and he is a brilliant player it is just marred by I'll discipline, if lambert ca get him to calm Dow it could prove to be a very good signing
Agree2
Disagree2
Bad bad bad move goes against everything we've done this season and would be demoralising to some of the players me would think
Agree2
Disagree1
Definitely DO NOT want mcgeady. we pay out for him that's most our budget. we won't buy anyone over 25 yrs old or anyone over 6-7 million because its jus the way villa work buy them young and cheap and develop the balls out of them. look at westwood lowton etc. no mcgeady not the 'villa way'
Agree2
Disagree1
Didn't PL sign Vlaar, El Ahmadi an re signed Guzan? Who are over 25 if I'm not wrong.
I wouldn't be surprised if we signed players between 25 an 28 but I don't think McGeady is the right type of player we need. We need to sign a CB an a LB maybe another DM before we sign wingers or striker
Agree8
Disagree0
20 May 2013 14:16:53
Villa contemplating re-signing Harry Forrester from Brentford,
Believable11
Unbelievable12
You shouldn't of mentioned brentford. People disagree purely for a low league team. If it said barca it would be a different story
Agree3
Disagree4
People disagreed purely because forrester is not gunna improve our team an wouldn't even improve our reserve team, so it would be a pointless signing.
Let's hope it's not true
Agree8
Disagree3
I would have him over Bannan any day of the week! At least he has a little something about him, unlike wee Jimmy Krankie who like a place kicker in grid iron can only take corners
Agree2
Disagree5
20 May 2013 12:58:10
Luke Murphy in talks with Villa according to close sources - likely to be first signing!
Believable15
Unbelievable3
Murphy will sign within 2-3 weeks for 3-4m, once Villas players have signed new contracts.
And followed by Charlie Austin for 4m
Agree10
Disagree5
It won't be as high as £4m as he's entering his final year of contract and will be available for £1-£2m at the very most.
Agree5
Disagree3
Austin will cost more than 4mill
Agree3
Disagree8
Why would we need Austin? Bench player same role as benteke but all round weaker
Agree1
Disagree6
Austin will be a bench warmer at most. Prefer a different type to him as Bowery will develop this year.
Agree3
Disagree3
I've heard a lot of fans talk of bent not being able to fit in to PLs style of football, if that's the case why is Austin being targeted as a potential signing? Good striker but He's just as one dimensional as bent
Agree6
Disagree4
But a lot cheaper wouldn't demand hhigh wages and will sign for 2-4m
Agree3
Disagree2
Why would burnley sell Austin for
1m-2m? They might aswell keep him for his last year of his contract an hope he fires them in to the prem.
He'll cost 4m minimum cus anythin less wouldn't be worth them selling
Agree9
Disagree3
Murphy will be cheap £1-2m, Austin is not a type of player Lambert will sign when we already have many strikers capable of doing what he does and probably better. some people have no clue about football.
Agree4
Disagree4
Murphy will cost approx £2 - 2.5 million if villa sign him soon. Otherwise they may get involved in a bidding war as man united have made a opening bid of £800, 00. which has been turned down (think they were taking the -iss with this offer).
Agree0
Disagree0
20 May 2013 10:11:32
Villa eyeing a move for Chalie Austin from Burnley 23 yr old striker who's scored 28 goals this season
Believable11
Unbelievable6
He would play on the bench don't see the point really
Agree6
Disagree11
Its a squad game pal so quality on the bench is as important as quality on the pitch.
Agree12
Disagree2
And he's a cheaper option to Darren Bent (who's younger and hungrier) as much as Bent is a preditor in front of goal our team just doesn't suit him anymore as our strikers work more in creating goals rather than having it served to him.
Agree8
Disagree2
Have any of you watched him? Seriously he's not that good, he scored I think 23 goals in the first 13 games and the 5 all season I just hope this deal dosent go threw
Agree3
Disagree4
I used to go to a lot of Swindon games. He's class but will need 1 year to settle in before he becomes as prolific as he is in the championship
Agree1
Disagree1